•

Office of the Premier

For reply p

lease quote:LJPIMW - TF/101162 - DOC/1011

7423

2 2 FEB

7.010

Mr Jugv

ir Singhderewa singhderewa@lycos.com

Dear Mr Singhderewa

Exec

utive Buildin

g

100

George Street Brisban

e

PO B

ox 15185 C

ity East

Quee

nsland 4002 Australi

a

Telephone

+617

3224 4500

Facsimile

+61 7 3221 363

1

Email

ThePremier@premiers.qld.gova.

u

Website

www.thepremier.qld.gov.a

u

Thank you for your emails of 27 December 2009 concerning your child, Nara. I have been requested to reply to you on the Premier’s behalf.

I note that an officer from the Queensland Police Service has recently been in contact with you to discuss your concerns.

I have forwarded a copy of your

l

etter to the Honourable Neil Roberts MP, Minister for Police, Corrective Services and Emergency Services, as the Minister responsible for these matters, for appropriate action.

Thank you for raising your concerns with the Premier

.

Yours sincerely

Senior

Phone 31 705158 515

Email. Mark.dillon@iccp-cpi.int

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Dear Mr. Mark Dillon,

REFERENCE: OTP: -CR -221/07
In reference to my telephone call to you today, Sir, I am resending my requests for production to
you.

In view of the attached evidence, an apology of the destruction and GENOCIDE of the aborigine
people of Australia, given by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, I urgently request you cooperate by giving
complete and detailed answers for the Court in United States, Court in Washington D.C.

Mark, I have read your letter, however it is so surprising that the matter I have sent to you is
not within the jurisdiction of the ICC. Let me address the Jurisdictional issue over the cold
blooded murder of families on the high seas off Christmas Island in Indian Ocean near Indonesia on
the Adelaide. However Australia has already admitted to genocide.

The ICCPR is quite clear. All detained persons be treated with humanity. Now read my complaint.
Throwing detained children over board and raping the mothers and fathers is inhuman. Showing
parents the child then throwing them overboard is torture. My discovery and spoliation is only the
beginning of the both a pattern of genocide, in Australia. My complaint to you it will be shown
was not investigated. Then the
aborigine issue that is already admitted as genocide has not been investigated.

Argument ONE

ARGUMENT TWO AN EXAMPLE OF JURSIDICTION

Similarly, the Interim Report stated that the responsible for the illegal seizure, removal,
abduction terrorist suspects” and that such acts “are contrary to principles of human
rights law.” Interim Report, supr Moreover, the Interim Report expressly
“condernn[ed] extraordinary renditions” and stated that the European Parli
… the extraordinary rendition of persons to places where

. . . a violation of the principle of ‘non-refouleme

Article 3 of the UN Convention Against Torture.” See !

Likewise, the United Nations Committee A that it is “concerned by the [United States'] rendition
any judicial procedure, to States where they face a real instructed the U.S. to “apply the
non-refoulement guara in its custody, cease the rendition of suspects … to Stat real risk of
torture, in order to comply with its obligatio the Convention [Against Torture].” U.N.
Corro Conclusions and Recommendations of the Committ Advance Unedited Version, 1J 20,
U.N. Doc. No. (May 18, 2006).

Argument Three

What is Universal Jurisdiction?

The most striking feature of the Pinochet case was that a Spanish judge had the authority to order
Pinochet’s arrest for crimes committed mostly in Chile and mostly against Chileans. This authority
derives from the rule of “universal jurisdiction”: the principle that every state has an interest
in bringing to justice the perpetrators of particular crimes of international concern, no matter
where the crime was committed, and regardless of the nationality of the perpetrators or their
victims.
Normally, jurisdiction over a crime depends on a link, usually territorial, between the prosecuting
state and the crime itself. But, as one leading lawyer said, “in the case of crimes against
humanity that link may be found in the simple fact that we are all human beings.”A principal
pragmatic reason why international law provides for universal jurisdiction is to make sure that
there is no “safe haven” for those responsible for the most serious crimes.
To determine which crimes give rise to universal jurisdiction under international law, we look at
international treaties–such as the U.N. Convention against Torture, or the Geneva Conventions for
war crimes–and the general custom of states (“customary international law”) under which genocide
and “crimes against humanity” are considered crimes of universal jurisdiction. In each case,
however, the key to determining whether a prosecution can actually be brought based on
universal jurisdiction will be the laws of the particular state in which the case is brought (the
“prosecuting state”). Among the human rights crimes subject to universal jurisdiction under
international law are completely included in my complaint.
In this case, an entire group of people were tortured and murdered on the high seas by

Australia:

The widely-ratified U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
defines genocide as “any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of
the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately
inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in
whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly
transferring children of the group to another group.” The killings of Tutsis in Rwanda, Kurds in
Iraq and Muslims in Bosnia are recent

examples of genocide. Spain accused Pinochet of genocide, using a broader definition of genocide
found in Spanish law which also punishes attempts to eliminate political groups, but
Britain did not retain this accusation.
Although the Genocide Convention does not specifically say so, under customary international law
any state may bring to justice, on the basis of universal jurisdiction, someone accused of
genocide.
The concept of “crimes against humanity” was first codified in the Charter for the Nuremberg
Tribunal that was created after World War II to try Nazi leaders. The Statute of the emerging
International Criminal Court (ICC) (article 7) now defines crimes against humanity as certain acts
such as murder, extermination, torture, enslavement, “disappearance,” rape, sexual slavery, etc.
when committed as part of a “widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian
population, with knowledge of the attack.” Other, similar, definitions of this concept are found in
the statutes of the international criminal tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. In each
case, it is the widespread or systematic nature of the crime that makes it a crime against
humanity.
I want to know sir

1. Each victim was murdered or produce the trial papers of the court where each murder victim has
been identified.
2. I have accused the nations of extermintation, torture, enslavement, “disappearance,” rape,
sexual slavery.
You say in you response you know how these children and families were terminated, disappeared,
tortured and murdered as an entire group.

During the WAR with IRAQ…..this is WAR CRIME too.

“Grave breaches”of the Geneva Conventions and the first Additional Protocol include such things as:
wilful killing; torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments; wilfully causing
great suffering, or serious injury to body or health, extensive destruction and
appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and
wantonly; compelling a prisoner of war or other protected person to serve in the forces of a
hostile power; wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of the rights of fair
and regular trial; taking of hostages; making

the civilian population or individual civilians the object of attack; launching an indiscriminate
attack in the knowledge that it will cause excessive loss of life, injury to civilians or damage to
civilian objects; the transfer by an occupying power of parts of its own civilian population into
the territory it occupies, or the transfer of all or parts of the population of the occupied
territory within or outside this territory.
How do you know that these people were not protected. Three doctors were serving in the IRAQ ARMY
and that is why there families were murdered as they were fleeing from IRAQ and Afghanistan.
The this is a fleeing civilian population of over 360 men women and children…..fleeing from the
scene of a war and they were murdered by their enemy.
Cases

In Germany, the Bavarian High Court sentenced a Bosnian Serb, Novislav Djajic, to five years
imprisonment in 1997 under the Geneva Conventions for aiding and abetting the killing of fourteen
Muslim men in Bosnia in 1992.

In September 1997, a former leader of a paramilitary Serb group, Nikola Jorgic, was convicted on
eleven counts of genocide and thirty counts of murder, and sentenced to life imprisonment by the
December 18, 1999 Düsseldorf High Court.

In Denmark, Bosnian Muslim Refik Saric is currently serving an eight-year sentence for war crimes,
charged under the Geneva Conventions with torturing detainees in a Croat- run prison in Bosnia in
1993.

In April 1999, a Swiss military court convicted a Rwandan national of war crimes there

I should be given the opportunity to completely challenge your jurisdictional statement.

France is currently prosecuting a Rwandan priest, Wenceslas Munyeshyaka, for genocide,
crimes against humanity, and torture. In addition, in July 1999, French police arrested a
Mauritanian colonel, Ely Ould Dah, who was studying at a French military

school, on the basis of the U.N. Convention against Torture, when two Mauritanian exiles came
forward and identified him as their torturer.

An Argentine navy officer, Alfredo Astiz, was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in
France for his participation in the torture of two French nuns in Argentina, even though he was not
in France. These same countries, however, require that in prosecutions based on universal
jurisdiction the alleged criminal be in their territory.
WHERE ARE THESE PEOPLE? WHO TOOK THEM?
Where “disappearances” are involved, however, it may be easier to avoid such
limitations. The U.N. Declaration on the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance
states that “Acts constituting enforced disappearance shall be considered a continuing offence as
long as the perpetrators continue to conceal the fate and the whereabouts of persons who have
disappeared and these facts remain unclarified.” This is logical, since non-acknowledgment of the
detention or non-disclosure of the fate or whereabouts of a detained person are key elements of the
offence of “disappearance.” Courts in Chile and Argentina have recently ruled that the continuing
nature of “disappearances” mean that these acts survive amnesties which bar the prosecution of
crimes committed before certain dates. In addition, because “disappearances” have been held to
constitute a potential form of mental torture as regards the loved ones of the “disappeared”
person, “disappearances” can trigger application of the “prosecute or extradite” provisions of the
U.N. Convention against Torture. The magistrate examining the extradition case against General
Pinochet thus ruled that, although the House of Lords had limited the charges to torture and
conspiracy to commit torture committed after December 1988, Spanish prosecutors could seek to show
that Pinochet’s intention in making his opponents “disappear” before 1988, and concealing their
whereabouts thereafter, was to inflict continuing mental torture on their relatives.
ATTACHMENTS ARE INCLUDED BELOW MY SIGNATURE. THE DOCUMENT IS DIGITALLY SIGNED.

Your sincerely

Jugvir Inder Singh

Wednesday, 13 February 2008
—————
The SPEAKER (Hon. Harry Jenkins) took the chair at 9 am and read prayers.
APOLOGY TO AUSTRALIA’S INDIGENOUS PEOPLES Mr RUDD (Griffith—Prime Minister) (9.00 am)—I move:
That today we honour the Indigenous peoples of this land, the oldest continuing cultures in human
history. We reflect on their past mistreatment.
We reflect in particular on the mistreatment of those who were Stolen Generations—this blemished
chapter in our nation’s history.
The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia’s history by righting the
wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future.
We apologise for the laws and policies of successive Parliaments and governments that have
inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians.
We apologise especially for the removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from
their families, their communities and their country.
For the pain, suffering and hurt of these Stolen Generations, their descendants and for their
families left behind, we say sorry. To the mothers and the fathers, the brothers and the sisters,
for the breaking up of families and communities, we say sorry. And for the indignity and
degradation thus inflicted on a proud people and a proud culture, we say sorry.
We the Parliament of Australia respectfully request that this apology be received in the spirit in
which it is offered as part of the healing of the nation.
For the future we take heart; resolving that this new page in the history of our great continent
can now be written. We today take this first step by acknowledging the past and laying claim to a
future that embraces all Australians. A future where this Parliament resolves that the injustices
of the past must never, never happen again.
A future where we harness the determination of all Australians, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, to
close the gap that lies between us in life expectancy, educational achievement and economic
opportunity.
A future where we embrace the possibility of new solutions to enduring problems where old
approaches have failed. A future based on mutual respect, mutual resolve and mutual responsibility.
A future where all Australians, whatever their origins, are truly equal partners, with equal
opportunities and with an equal stake in shaping the next chapter in the history of this great
country, Australia.
There comes a time in the history of nations when their peoples must become fully reconciled to
their past if they are to go forward with confidence to embrace their future. Our nation,
Australia, has reached such a time. That is why the parliament is today here assembled: to deal
with this unfinished business of the nation, to remove a great stain from the nation’s soul and, in
a true spirit of reconciliation, to open a new chapter in the history of this great land,
Australia.
Last year I made a commitment to the Australian people that if we formed the next government of the
Commonwealth we would in parliament say sorry to the stolen generations. Today I honour that
commitment. I said we would do so early in the life of the new parliament. Again, today I honour
that commitment by doing so at the commencement of this the 42nd parliament of the Commonwealth.
Because the time has come, well and truly come, for all peoples of our great country, for all
citizens of our great Commonwealth, for all Australians—those who are Indigenous and those who are
not—to come together to reconcile and together build a new future for our nation.
Some have asked, ‘Why apologise?’ Let me begin to answer by telling the parliament just a little of
one person’s story—an elegant, eloquent and wonderful woman in her 80s, full of life, full of funny
stories, despite what has happened in her life’s journey, a woman who has travelled a long way to
be with us today, a member of the stolen generation who shared some of her story with me when I
called around to see her just a few days ago. Nanna Nungala Fejo, as she prefers to be called, was
born in the late 1920s. She remembers her earliest childhood days living with her family and her
community in a bush camp just outside Tennant Creek. She remembers the love and the warmth and the
kinship of those days long ago, including traditional dancing around the camp fire at night. She
loved the dancing. She remembers once getting into strife when, as a four-year-old girl, she
insisted on dancing with the male tribal elders rather than just sitting and watching the men, as
the girls were supposed to do.
But then, sometime around 1932, when she was about four, she remembers the coming of the welfare
men. Her family had feared that day and had dug holes in the creek bank where the children could
run and hide. What they had not expected was that the white welfare men did not come alone. They
brought a truck, two white men and an Aboriginal stockman on horseback cracking his stockwhip. The
kids were found; they ran for their mothers, screaming, but they could not get away. They were
herded and piled onto the back of the truck. Tears flowing, her mum tried clinging to the sides of
the truck as her children were taken away to the Bungalow in Alice, all in the name of protection.
A few years later, government policy changed. Now the children would be handed over to the missions
to be cared for by the churches. But which church would care for them? The kids were simply told to
line up in three lines. Nanna Feijo and her sister stood in the middle line, her older brother and
cousin on her left. Those on the left were told that they had become Catholics, those in the middle
Methodists and those on the right Church of
England. That is how the complex questions of post-reformation theology were resolved in the
Australian outback in the 1930s. It was as crude as that. She and her sister were sent to a
Methodist mission on Goulburn Island and
then Croker Island. Her Catholic brother was sent to work at a cattle station and her cousin to a
Catholic mission.

Nanna Feijo’s family had been broken up for a second time. She stayed at the mission until after
the war, when she was allowed to leave for a prearranged job as a domestic in Darwin. She was 16.
Nanna Feijo never saw her mum again. After she left the mission, her brother let her know that her
mum had died years before, a broken woman fretting for the children that had literally been ripped
away from her.
I asked Nanna Feijo what she would have me say today about her story. She thought for a few moments
then said that what I should say today was that all mothers are important. And she added:
‘Families—keeping them together is very important. It’s a good thing that you are surrounded by
love and that love is passed down the generations. That’s what gives you happiness.’ As I left,
later on, Nanna Feijo took one of my staff aside, wanting to make sure that I was not too hard on
the Aboriginal stockman who had hunted those kids down all those years ago. The stockman had found
her again decades later, this time himself to say, ‘Sorry.’ And remarkably, extraordinarily, she
had forgiven him.
Nanna Feijo’s is just one story. There are thousands, tens of thousands of them: stories of forced
separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their mums and dads over the
better part of a century. Some of these stories are graphically told in Bringing them home, the
report commissioned in 1995 by Prime Minister Keating and received in 1997 by Prime Minister
Howard. There is something terribly primal about these firsthand accounts. The pain is searing; it
screams from the pages. The hurt, the humiliation, the degradation and the sheer brutality of the
act of physically separating a mother from her children is a deep assault on our senses and on our
most elemental humanity.
These stories cry out to be heard; they cry out for an apology. Instead, from the nation’s
parliament there has been a stony, stubborn and deafening silence for more than a decade; a view
that somehow we, the parliament, should suspend our most basic instincts of what is right and what
is wrong; a view that, instead, we should look for any pretext to push this great wrong to one
side, to leave it languishing with the historians, the academics and the cultural warriors, as if
the stolen generations are little more than an interesting sociological phenomenon. But the stolen
generations are not intellectual curiosities. They are human beings, human beings who have been
damaged deeply by the decisions of parliaments and governments. But, as of today, the time for
denial, the time for delay, has at last come to an end.
The nation is demanding of its political leadership to take us forward. Decency, human decency,
universal human decency, demands that the nation now step forward to right an historical wrong.
That is what we are doing in this place today. But should there still be doubts as to why we must
now act, let the parliament reflect for a moment on the following facts: that, between 1910 and
1970, between 10 and 30 per cent of Indigenous children were forcibly taken from their mothers and
fathers; that, as a result, up to 50,000 children were forcibly taken from their families; that
this was the product of the deliberate, calculated policies of the state as reflected in the
explicit powers given to them under statute; that this policy was taken to such extremes by some in
administrative authority that the forced extractions of children of so-called ‘mixed lineage’ were
seen as part of a broader policy of dealing with ‘the problem of the Aboriginal population’.
One of the most notorious examples of this approach was from the Northern Territory Protector of
Natives, who stated:
Generally by the fifth and invariably by the sixth generation, all native characteristics of the
Australian aborigine are eradicated. The problem of our half-castes—
to quote the protector—
will quickly be eliminated by the complete disappearance of the black race, and the swift
submergence of their progeny in the white …
The Western Australian Protector of Natives expressed not dissimilar views, expounding them at
length in Canberra in 1937 at the first national conference on Indigenous affairs that brought
together the Commonwealth and state protectors of natives. These are uncomfortable things to be
brought out into the light. They are not pleasant. They are profoundly disturbing. But we must
acknowledge these facts if we are to deal once and for all with the argument that the policy of
generic forced separation was somehow well motivated, justified by its historical context and, as a
result, unworthy of any apology today.
Then we come to the argument of intergenerational responsibility, also used by some to argue
against giving an apology today. But let us remember the fact that the forced removal of Aboriginal
children was happening as late as the early 1970s. The 1970s is not exactly a point in remote
antiquity. There are still serving members of this parliament who were first elected to this place
in the early 1970s. It is well within the adult memory span of many of us. The uncomfortable truth
for us all is that the parliaments of the nation, individually and collectively, enacted statutes
and delegated authority under those statutes that made the forced removal of children on racial
grounds fully lawful.
There is a further reason for an apology as well: it is that reconciliation is in fact an
expression of a core value of our nation—and that value is a fair go for all. There is a deep and
abiding belief in the Australian community that, for the stolen generations, there was no fair go
at all. There is a pretty basic Aussie belief that says that it is time to put right this most
outrageous of wrongs. It is for these reasons, quite apart from concerns of fundamental human
decency, that the governments and parliaments of this nation must make this apology—because, put
simply, the laws that our parliaments enacted made the stolen generations possible. We, the
parliaments of the nation, are ultimately responsible, not those who gave effect to our laws. And
the problem lay with the laws themselves. As has been said of settler societies elsewhere, we are
the bearers of many blessings from our ancestors; therefore we must also be the bearer of their
burdens as well. Therefore, for our nation, the course of

action is clear: that is, to deal now with what has become one of the darkest chapters in
Australia’s history. In
doing so, we are doing more than contending with the facts, the evidence and the often rancorous
public debate. In
doing so, we are also wrestling with our own soul. This is not, as some would argue, a
black-armband view of
history; it is just the truth: the cold, confronting, uncomfortable truth—facing it, dealing with
it, moving on from
it. Until we fully confront that truth, there will always be a shadow hanging over us and our
future as a fully
united and fully reconciled people. It is time to reconcile. It is time to recognise the injustices
of the past. It is time
to say sorry. It is time to move forward together.
To the stolen generations, I say the following: as Prime Minister of Australia, I am sorry. On
behalf of the government of Australia, I am sorry. On behalf of the parliament of Australia, I am
sorry. I offer you this apology without qualification. We apologise for the hurt, the pain and
suffering that we, the parliament, have caused you by the laws that previous parliaments have
enacted. We apologise for the indignity, the degradation and the humiliation these laws embodied.
We offer this apology to the mothers, the fathers, the brothers, the sisters, the families and the
communities whose lives were ripped apart by the actions of successive governments under
successive parliaments. In making this apology, I would also like to speak personally to the
members of the stolen generations and their families: to those here today, so many of you; to those
listening across the nation—from
Yuendumu, in the central west of the Northern Territory, to Yabara, in North Queensland, and to
Pitjantjatjara in
South Australia.
I know that, in offering this apology on behalf of the government and the parliament, there is
nothing I can say today that can take away the pain you have suffered personally. Whatever words I
speak today, I cannot undo that. Words alone are not that powerful; grief is a very personal thing.
I ask those non-Indigenous Australians listening today who may not fully understand why what we are
doing is so important to imagine for a moment that this had happened to you. I say to honourable
members here present: imagine if this had happened to us. Imagine the crippling effect. Imagine how
hard it would be to forgive. My proposal is this: if the apology we extend today is accepted in the
spirit of reconciliation, in which it is offered, we can today resolve together that there be a new
beginning for Australia. And it is to such a new beginning that I believe the nation is now calling
us.
Australians are a passionate lot. We are also a very practical lot. For us, symbolism is important
but, unless the great symbolism of reconciliation is accompanied by an even greater substance, it
is little more than a clanging gong. It is not sentiment that makes history; it is our actions that
make history. Today’s apology, however inadequate, is aimed at righting past wrongs. It is also
aimed at building a bridge between Indigenous and non- Indigenous Australians—a bridge based on a
real respect rather than a thinly veiled contempt. Our challenge for the future is to cross that
bridge and, in so doing, to embrace a new partnership between Indigenous and non- Indigenous
Australians—to embrace, as part of that partnership, expanded Link-up and other critical services
to help the stolen generations to trace their families if at all possible and to provide dignity to
their lives. But the core of this partnership for the future is to close the gap between Indigenous
and non-Indigenous Australians on life expectancy, educational achievement and employment
opportunities. This new partnership on closing the gap will set concrete targets for the future:
within a decade to halve the widening gap in literacy, numeracy and
employment outcomes and opportunities for Indigenous Australians, within a decade to halve the
appalling gap in infant mortality rates between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children and, within
a generation, to close the
equally appalling 17-year life gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous in overall life
expectancy.
The truth is: a business as usual approach towards Indigenous Australians is not working. Most old
approaches are not working. We need a new beginning—a new beginning which contains real measures of
policy success or policy failure; a new beginning, a new partnership, on closing the gap with
sufficient flexibility not to insist on a one-size-fits-all approach for each of the hundreds of
remote and regional Indigenous communities across the country but instead allowing flexible,
tailored, local approaches to achieve commonly-agreed national objectives that lie at the core of
our proposed new partnership; a new beginning that draws intelligently on the experiences of new
policy settings across the nation. However, unless we as a parliament set a destination for the
nation, we have no clear point to guide our policy, our programs or our purpose; we have no
centralised organising principle.
Let us resolve today to begin with the little children—a fitting place to start on this day of
apology for the stolen generations. Let us resolve over the next five years to have every
Indigenous four-year-old in a remote Aboriginal community enrolled in and attending a proper early
childhood education centre or opportunity and engaged in proper preliteracy and prenumeracy
programs. Let us resolve to build new educational opportunities for these little ones, year by
year, step by step, following the completion of their crucial preschool year. Let us resolve to use
this systematic approach to build future educational opportunities for Indigenous children to
provide proper primary and preventive health care for the same children, to begin the task of
rolling back the obscenity that we find today in infant mortality rates in remote Indigenous
communities—up to four times higher than in other communities.
None of this will be easy. Most of it will be hard—very hard. But none of it is impossible, and all
of it is achievable with clear goals, clear thinking, and by placing an absolute premium on
respect, cooperation and mutual responsibility as the guiding principles of this new partnership on
closing the gap. The mood of the nation is for reconciliation now, between Indigenous and
non-Indigenous Australians. The mood of the nation on Indigenous policy and politics is now very
simple. The nation is calling on us, the politicians, to move beyond our infantile bickering, our
point-scoring and our mindlessly partisan politics and to elevate this one core area of national
responsibility to a rare position beyond the partisan divide. Surely this is the unfulfilled spirit
of the 1967 referendum. Surely, at least from this day forward, we should give it a go.

Let me take this one step further and take what some may see as a piece of political posturing and
make a practical proposal to the opposition on this day, the first full sitting day of the new
parliament. I said before the election that the nation needed a kind of war cabinet on parts of
Indigenous policy, because the challenges are too great and the consequences are too great to allow
it all to become a political football, as it has been so often in the past. I therefore propose a
joint policy commission, to be led by the Leader of the Opposition and me, with a mandate to
develop and implement—to begin with—an effective housing strategy for remote communities over the
next five years. It will be consistent with the government’s policy framework, a new partnership
for closing the gap. If this commission operates well, I then propose that it work on the further
task of constitutional recognition of the first Australians, consistent with the longstanding
platform commitments of my party and the pre-election position of the opposition. This would
probably be desirable in any event because, unless such a proposition were absolutely bipartisan,
it would fail at a referendum. As I have said before, the time has come for
new approaches to enduring problems. Working constructively together on such defined projects
would, I believe, meet with the support of the nation. It is time for fresh ideas to fashion the
nation’s future.
Mr Speaker, today the parliament has come together to right a great wrong. We have come together to
deal with the past so that we might fully embrace the future. We have had sufficient audacity of
faith to advance a pathway to that future, with arms extended rather than with fists still
clenched. So let us seize the day. Let it not become a moment of mere sentimental reflection. Let
us take it with both hands and allow this day, this day of national
reconciliation, to become one of those rare moments in which we might just be able to transform the
way in which the nation thinks about itself, whereby the injustice administered to the stolen
generations in the name of these,
our parliaments, causes all of us to reappraise, at the deepest level of our beliefs, the real
possibility of
reconciliation writ large: reconciliation across all Indigenous Australia; reconciliation across
the entire history of
the often bloody encounter between those who emerged from the Dreamtime a thousand generations ago
and
those who, like me, came across the seas only yesterday; reconciliation which opens up whole new
possibilities
for the future.
It is for the nation to bring the first two centuries of our settled history to a close, as we
begin a new chapter. We embrace with pride, admiration and awe these great and ancient cultures we
are truly blessed to have among us—cultures that provide a unique, uninterrupted human thread
linking our Australian continent to the most ancient prehistory of our planet. Growing from this
new respect, we see our Indigenous brothers and sisters with fresh eyes, with new eyes, and we have
our minds wide open as to how we might tackle, together, the great practical challenges that
Indigenous Australia faces in the future.
Let us turn this page together: Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, government and
opposition, Commonwealth and state, and write this new chapter in our nation’s story together.
First Australians, First Fleeters, and those who first took the oath of allegiance just a few weeks
ago. Let’s grasp this opportunity to craft a new future for this great land: Australia. I commend
the motion to the House.
Honourable members applauding—

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JUGVIR INDER SINGH │ CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-11-70

4409 Hoffner Suite 405 │ Orlando, FL 32818
│ telephones: 5714268522 │ email:singhderewa@lycos.com
│

JUGVIR INDER SINGH │ JUDGE: John Bates

AS INDIVDUAL AND HEAD OF │ THE ESTATE OF THE │
SINGHDEREWA FAMILY │
4409 Hoffner Suite 405 │ Orlando, FL 32812
│ telephones: 5714268522 │ email:singhderewa@lycos.com
│

PLAINTIFFS │
│

VERSUS │

│

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA │

EMBASSY OF Australia

DENNIS JAMES RICHARDSON │

1601 Massachusetts Ave, NW │ Washington DC 20036 –
│ Telephone: (202) 797 3000 │ Fax: (202) 797 3168

│ UNION OF INDIA │ EMBASSY OF INDIA
│ Mr. Rarendra Sen │
2107 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., │

Washington D.C. │ USA – 20008
│ Phone: (202) 939-7000 │ Fax: (202) 265-4351
│
│ UNITED NATIONS │ UN Headquarters
│ Mr. Nicolas Michel, │ Under-Secretary-General,
│ The Legal Counsel, │
ROOM 3427A │

First Avenue at 46th Street │ New York, NY 10017
│ Tel (212) 963-1234 │ TEL (212)963-5012

│

And John Does │

1-99

DEFENDANTS │

spoliation letter to opposing counsel for the United
Nations

October 12, 2008
Attention

M.P.Dillon
Head of the Evidence Unit Office of the Prosecutor International Criminal Court

UNITED NATIONS │ UN Headquarters
│ Mr. Nicolas Michel, │ Under-Secretary-General,
│ The Legal Counsel, │
ROOM 3427A │
First Avenue at 46th Street │ New York, NY 10017
│ Tel (212) 963-1234 │ TEL (212)963-5012

re: [matter (, JUGVIR INDER SINGH AND ANR. v. COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHRS.]

Dear: Mr. M.P Dillon and Mr. Nicolas Michel,

By this letter, you and your client are hereby given notice not to destroy, conceal or alter any
paper or electronic files and other data generated by and/or stored on your client’s, United
Nations and the International Criminal Court , computers and storage media (e.g., hard disks,
floppy disks, backup tapes), or any other electronic data, such as voice mail. As you know, your
client’s United Nations and the International Criminal Court, failure to comply with this notice
can result in severe sanctions being imposed by the Court {and liability in tort} for spoliation of
evidence or potential evidence.

Through discovery we expect to obtain from you a number of documents and things, including files
stored on your client’s, computers and your client’s United Nations and the International Criminal
Court, computer storage media. {As part of our initial discovery efforts, you [are hereby served
with/will soon receive] [initial/supplemental] interrogatories and requests for documents and
things.}

In order to avoid spoliation, you will need to provide the data requested on the original media. Do
not reuse any media to provide this data.

Although we may bring a motion for an order preserving documents and things from destruction or
alteration, your client’s United Nations and the International Criminal Court, obligation to
preserve documents and things for discovery in this case arises in law and equity independently
from any order on such motion.

Electronic documents and the storage media on which they reside contain relevant, discoverable
information beyond that which may be found in printed documents. Therefore, even where a paper copy
exists, we [seek/will seek] all documents in their electronic form along with information about
those documents contained on the media. We also [seek/will seek] paper printouts of only those
documents that contain unique information after they were printed out (such as paper documents
containing handwriting, signatures, marginalia, drawings, annotations, highlighting
and redactions) along with any paper documents for which no corresponding electronic files exist.
Our discovery requests [ask/will ask] for certain data on the hard disks, floppy disks and backup
media used in your client’s {clients’} computers, some of which data are not readily available to
an ordinary computer user, such as “deleted” files and “file fragments.” As you may know, although
a user may “erase” or “delete” a file, all that is really erased is a reference to that file in a
table on the hard disk; unless overwritten with new data, a “deleted” file can be as intact on the
disk as any “active” file you would see in a directory listing.

Courts have made it clear that all information available on electronic storage media is
discoverable, whether readily readable (“active”) or “deleted” but recoverable. See, e.g., Easley,
McCaleb & Assocs., Inc. v. Perry, No. E-2663 (Ga. Super. Ct. July 13, 1994; “deleted” files on a
party’s computer hard drive held to be discoverable, and plaintiff’s expert was allowed to retrieve
all recoverable files); Santiago v. Miles, 121 F.R.D. 636, 640 (W.D.N.Y. 1988; a request for “raw
information in computer banks” was proper and obtainable under the discovery rules); Gates Rubber
Co. v. Bando Chemical Indus., Ltd., 167 F.R.D. 90, 112 (D. Colo. 1996; mirror-image copy of
everything on a hard drive “the method which would yield the most complete and accurate results,”
chastising a party’s expert for failing to do so); and Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Teamsters Local
2000, et al., 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2460, (USDC Minn. 1999); court ordered image-copying by
Northwest’s expert of home computer hard drives of employees suspected of orchestrating an illegal
“sick-out” on the Internet).

Accordingly, electronic data and storage media that may be subject to our discovery requests and
that your client{s} are obligated to maintain and not alter or destroy, include but are not limited
to the following:

Introduction: description of files and file types sought

All digital or analog electronic files, including “deleted” files and file fragments, stored in
machine- readable format on magnetic, optical or other storage media, including the hard drives or
floppy disks used by your client’s {clients’} computers and their backup media (e.g., other hard
drives, backup tapes, floppies, Jaz cartridges, CD-ROMs) or otherwise, whether such files have been
reduced to paper printouts or not. More specifically, your client{s} is {are} to preserve all of
your e- mails, both sent and received, whether internally or externally; all word-processed files,
including drafts and revisions; all spreadsheets, including drafts and revisions; all databases;
all CAD (computer-aided design) files, including drafts and revisions; all presentation data or
slide shows produced by presentation software (such as Microsoft PowerPoint); all graphs, charts
and other data produced by project management software (such as Microsoft Project); all data
generated by calendaring, task management and personal information management (PIM) software (such
as Microsoft Outlook or Lotus Notes); all data created with the use of personal data assistants
(PDAs), such as PalmPilot, HP Jornada, Cassiopeia or other Windows CE-based or Pocket PC devices;
all data created with the use of document management software; all data created with
the use of paper and electronic mail logging and routing software; all Internet and Web-browser-
generated history files, caches and “cookies” files generated at the workstation of each employee
and/or agent in your client’s {clients’} employ and on any and all backup storage media; and any
and all other files generated by users through the use of computers and/or telecommunications,
including but not limited to voice mail. Further, you are to preserve any log or logs of network
use by employees or otherwise, whether kept in paper or electronic form, and to preserve all copies
of your backup tapes and the software necessary to reconstruct the data on those tapes, so that
there can be made a complete, bit-by-bit “mirror” evidentiary image copy of the storage media of
each and every personal computer (and/or workstation) and network server in your control and
custody, as well as image copies of all hard drives retained by you and no longer in service, but
in use at any time from 2001 to the present.

Your client is also not to pack, compress, purge or otherwise dispose of files and parts of files
unless a true and correct copy of such files is made.

Your client is also to preserve and not destroy all passwords, decryption procedures (including, if
necessary, the software to decrypt the files); network access codes, ID names, manuals, tutorials,
written instructions, decompression or reconstruction software, and any and all other information
and things necessary to access, view and (if necessary) reconstruct the electronic data we [are
requesting/will request] through discovery.

1. Business Records: [All documents and information about documents containing backup and/or
archive policy and/or procedure, document retention policy, names of backup and/or archive
software, names and addresses of any offsite storage provider.]

a. All e-mail and information about e-mail (including message contents, header information and
logs of e-mail system usage) {sent or received} by the following persons:

Min. far Finance & Ad:mirustration
Nic:holss IIIIINCHIN
36 Gr cll str”"t
Kent TQ’I,.”;..I”L SA .5(){57
Phone: (08) 8362 8600
Fax: (08) 8362 8579
Tall Fr”": 1800 817 712

Min. far Foreign Affairs A nder DO”\’VNER POBcoc6022
House af Repr.esentativ.es Parliament Hou:re canberra A cr 2600
Tel: (02) 6277 7500
Fax: (02) 6273 4112
En..•il: A.l222i!.!la&:!E.: mtul:2!L.i!!!.

Min. far Health & Aging Anthony ABBOT POBcoc6022
Hcrus af R.epr-esentativ”" Parliament H.::::o.J.S.e canberra ACT 2600
Tel: (02) 6277 7220
Fax: 6273 4146

Min. for Huro..an Se:rvic,e.s
.Joe HOCKEY
POBcocE022
Hcrus af Repr-esentativ”" Parliament Hou:::…:e canberra ACT 2600
Tel: (02) 6277 7200
Fax: (02) 6273 4406
E:ms.il: L!±::l:d :L!l:!l !2!i:..2:22 :!

Min. for Inunigration & Multicultural Affairs
Arnands. V ANS’TONE
Ground Fleer, 75 Hindrnarsh Square,
Adelaide SA 5000
Tel: (08) 8223 1757
Fax: (08) 8223 1750
Tall free: 1800 018 282

MirL. far Juztice & CUst=
Christopher ELLISON
89 A berd”"n street
Northbridge WA 6003
Tel: (02) 6277 7260
Fax: (02) 6273 7008
Email: k!&!L b22!L.i!!!.

Min. for Revenue
Peter DUTTON

POBCil<€022
House of Repres.entatives Parliament House canberra Acr 260:)
Tel:(02) 6277 7300
Fax: (02) 6273 4125
Ema.il: Pft!tr put trm MP@iMpb 29Y

MID. for Srn.all Business & Touris:rr
Fran BAILEY
POBCil<€022
House of Repres.entatives Parliament House canberra Acr 260:) Tel:(02) 6277 7450
Fax: (02) 6273 9394
Ema.il : Fran.Bailey.MP@ap!Lgov.a

MID. for Trade
Mark VAILE

Tre.asur.er
Peter COSTELLO
POBCil<€022
House of Repres.entatives Parliament House canberra Acr 260:)
Tel:(02) 6277 7340
Fax: (02) 6273 3420

Special Min.of Stale GsryNAIRN POBCil<€022
House of Representatives
Parliament House canberra Acr 260:) Fax: (02) 6273 4541
Email: G.Naim.MPaph.29V.au

Allomey General Philip RUDDOCK POBCil<€022
House of Representatives Parliament House canberra Acr 260:)
Tel:(02) 6277 7300
Fax: (02) 6273 4102

Chmn., Reserve Bank
Ian J.MACFARLANE
R eserve BanK of Australia
GPO BoX3947
SYDNEY NSW 2001
AUSTRALIA
+61 2 9551 8116

Ambassador to the US Dennis RICHARDSON R.G.caseyBuilding,
Jolm McEwenQ'escent,
Barton Acr, 0221Australia.
Tel:+61262611111Fax: +61262613111

Permanent Representative to the UN, New York
RobertlULL

150 East42nd Street
33rd Floor
N9W York NY 1001 7·5S12
Phone: •1 212 351·6600
Fax: .1 212 351·6610

High Conm1ksioner to India
John MeCo.rlhy R.G.Casey Building, Jolm McEwen Crescent,
Barton, ACT, 0221A11stralia.
Tel: +612 6261 un Fax: +612 62613U1

Premier Peter Dougbs Eeo.Ule
Premier of Queensland

Phone: 07 3224 4500,
Facsimile: 07 3221 3631
PO Box 15185
City East
Q.Jeensland 4002

TheA-emier@premiers.gld.gov.au

Premier Morris IEIAUA
Premier of New South Wales
Level40 Governor Macqwrie Tower
1Farrer Place
Sydney, NSW 2fXI)
(02) 92285239
lbeprtpljer@www rewgpy au

b. All other e-mail and information about e-mail (including message contents, header information
and logs of e-mail system usage) containing information about or related to:

1. Children in Detention in Australia and in Camps in Australia contracted foreign states.

2. Contact with any child taken on an Australian vessel such as HMAS Adelaide, then considered
dehumanized with the depraved heart let to drown in open seas.
3. Any child taken on an Australian vessel and transported to another state other than

Australia..

4. The contracts signed by Micheal Thawley and you personally, during the time the Commonwealth
of Australia was providing wheat shipments to the enemy of the United States, Iraq. These ships
left from Australian soil with false documentation.
5. Your presence by contracts during the conflict with Iraq, Representing Australia during the
Tigris Oil, BHP, AWB trading with the enemy and bribing IRAQ, (see cole Commission Report) and any
registration by you as an Agent representing Australian interests with FISA during this time to
present.
6. Your personal emails during this period of treason by the Commonwealth of Australia

.where a Mr. Stott an Australian, of various first names, has appeared at any time in any of your
client's correspondence.
7. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission investigations on your clients for the
violation of Human Rights, whether the outcome was positive or negative, does not matter.
8. Transporting Gold from Iraq to Perth, during this present conflict, being allowed into the
Commonwealth of Australia, into the Perth Mint, in Perth, Western Australia, and your role in this
transaction if any.
9. The class action Suit by the American Farmers against AWB, Australian Wheat Board and your
actions in guiding your client in the Senate of the United States as maybe claimed b John Warner,
of Va. Provide all your actions
10. Securities Exchange Commission investigations into BHP AND AWB fraudulent accounting and if
you played a part in defending these actions.
11. All Commonwealth of Australia National and State Annual Reports and Tax reports and email
supporting any Transactions reflecting and or NOT reflecting the movement of cash and income by the
Commonwealth as a result of Australian company profits and loss, being that of the Australian Wheat
Board (AWB), BHP

Billiton worldwide, Tigris Oil, any Jordan Based Transport Companies reflecting sales of wheat and
arbitrage of gold by AWB, BHP BILLITON.
12. Emails explaining the presence of Australian Businessmen in Iraq during the conflict with Iraq
and all applications by these businessmen to the Commonwealth of Australia, being that they
traveled in and out of United States of America, where you are the representative.
13. Australian companies shipped wheat to Iraq during the conflict (see cole commission report)
preserve the movement of all applications and inspection of these vessels
and how false documents were passed in the Commonwealth of Australia.

14. Australians claimed that the IRAQ had weapons of Mass Destruction preserve the documents of
all Australian Uranium Cartel Suits, where your client has joined forces with Canadian Companies,
France, South Africa, companies in the United States, Gulf, Westinghouse, to spike the price of
uranium in the world market. IF you defended these actions please provide your details and account
for your support of the WMDS in IRAQ.
15. Investigations are ongoing around the World on the Genocide of the Aboriginal Children by your
clients, maybe a million to a hundred thousand children, being murdered or transported as slaves,
to distant lands preserve the investigations.
16. An illegal WHITE only Apartheid Policy of your client, being in violations of all
international civilized society and how and when if ended.
17. The replacement of present Governor General is based on the lewd conduct with children the
previous Governor General, reflecting an pattern, of arrest of a senior Australian Diplomat in
Indonesia for child molestation and the Lost Generation of Children. Preserve documentation to
change the identity of the plaintiff’'s child.
18. Preserve the Yahoo suspension, of Australian accounts for aiding and abetting kidnapping.
19. Failure to act by the Public Official of Australia is a criminal offense in all states,
preserve thee documentation where public official aided and abetted in the violations so cited in
the complaint, and the reasons non arrests for failure to act have taken place.

c. All databases (including all records and fields and structural information in such databases),
containing any reference to and/or information about or related to:

2. Transfer of any Australian Product destined for Iraq under any application of the

Australian Wheat Board.

3. Transactions of Australian Uranium while Australia was a part of any alleged Uranium

Cartel.

4. Financial Records of Australian Wheat Board bribes reflected in Australian Tax Office and
Department of Trade as regards all Transactions reflected in the Cole Commission.
5. Databases of Aboriginal Families murdered, separated, removed from all localities within

Australia and its islands on command or policy of your clients.

6. Databases of all applications of non-whites for any application of stay in Australia.

7. Databases of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq as told the world.

8. Database of the presence of any Australian in Iraq during the declaration of war or sanctions
of the United Nations in Iraq.
9. Databases of all Applications of BHP Billiton as stated in the Cole Report.

10. Databases of BHP Billiton, AWB, and Tigris Oil Conspiracy for the control of Iraq and and
wheat by any Australian Citizen present in Iraq during the United Nations Sanctions and declaration
of hostilities with Iraq.
11. All applications by a Charles Myles Stott, an Australian, with your client. All identification
changes including any aliases.
12. Databases of transactions of Perth Mint reflecting the movement of Saddam Soviet

Stamped Gold through Australian Customs into the Mint.

13. Databases of Garth Evans Minister in Australian Trade or others and his opinions on these IRAQ
AWB trades
14. Australian Wheat Board Databases of investigations with the State Trading Corporation of
India.
15. Databases of all non-whites separated from their little children in violations of the Child

Rights of United Nations, cases in Australian Courts.

16. Databases of all SIEV related actions.

17. Databases of Centrelink reflecting any claim of the plaintiff as regards Nara Avalon.

d. All logs of activity (both in paper and electronic formats) on computer systems and networks
that have or may have been used to process or store electronic data containing information about or
related to:
1. Transfer of any Australian Product destined for Iraq under any application of the

Australian Wheat Board.

2. Transactions of Australian Uranium while Australia was a part of any alleged

Uranium Cartel.

3. Financial Records of Australian Wheat Board bribes reflected in Australian Tax Office and
Department of Trade as regards all Transactions reflected in the Cole Commission.

4. Databases of Aboriginal Families murdered, separated, removed from all localities within
Australia and its islands on command or policy of your clients.
5. Databases of all applications of non-whites for any application of stay in Australia.

6. Databases of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq as told the world.

7. Database of the presence of any Australian in Iraq during the declaration of war or sanctions
of the United Nations in Iraq.
8. Databases of all Our Reference: OTP-CR-221/07 in the International Criminal

Court.

9. Forwarding criminal cases based on the Our Reference: OTP-CR-221/07 International Criminal
Court to FBI (USA) EUROPOL (EU) INTERPOL, Government of Indonesia, or other world enforcement
bodies

10.

11. Databases of all Applications of BHP Billiton as stated in the Cole Report Australia and United
Nations.
12. Databases of BHP Billiton, AWB, and Tigris Oil Conspiracy for the control of Iraq and wheat by
any Australian Citizen present in Iraq during the United Nations Sanctions and declaration of
hostilities with Iraq.
13. All applications by a Charles Myles Stott, an Australian, with your client. All identification
changes including any aliases.
14. Databases of transactions of Perth Mint reflecting the movement of Saddam Soviet

Stamped Gold through Australian Customs into the Mint.

15. Databases of Garth Evans Minister in Australian Trade or others and his opinions on these IRAQ
AWB trades
16. Australian Wheat Board Databases of investigations with the State Trading

Corporation of India.

17. Databases of all non-whites separated from their little children in violations of the

Child Rights of United Nations, cases in Australian Courts.

18. Databases of all SIEV related actions.

19. Databases of Centrelink reflecting any claim of the plaintiff as regards Nara Avalon. e. All
word processing files, including prior drafts, “deleted” files and file fragments,
containing information about or related to:

1. Transfer of any Australian Product destined for Iraq under any application of the

Australian Wheat Board.

2. Transactions of Australian Uranium while Australia was a part of any alleged

Uranium Cartel.

3. Financial Records of Australian Wheat Board bribes reflected in Australian Tax Office and
Department of Trade as regards all Transactions reflected in the Cole Commission.
4. Databases of Aboriginal Families murdered, separated, removed from all localities within
Australia and its islands on command or policy of your clients.
5. Databases of all applications of non-whites for any application of stay in Australia.

6. Databases of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq as told the world.

7. Database of the presence of any Australian in Iraq during the declaration of war or sanctions
of the United Nations in Iraq.
8. Databases of all Applications of BHP Billiton as stated in the Cole Report.

9. Databases of BHP Billiton, AWB, and Tigris Oil Conspiracy for the control of Iraq and and
wheat by any Australian Citizen present in Iraq during the United Nations Sanctions and declaration
of hostilities with Iraq.
10. All applications by a Charles Myles Stott, an Australian, with your client. All identification
changes including any aliases.
11. Databases of transactions of Perth Mint reflecting the movement of Saddam Soviet

Stamped Gold through Australian Customs into the Mint.

12. Databases of Garth Evans Minister in Australian Trade or others and his opinions on these IRAQ
AWB trades
13. Australian Wheat Board Databases of investigations with the State Trading

Corporation of India.

14. Databases of all non-whites separated from their little children in violations of the

Child Rights of United Nations, cases in Australian Courts.

15. Databases of all SIEV related actions.

16. Databases of Centrelink reflecting any claim of the plaintiff as regards Nara Avalon. f.
With regard to electronic data created by application programs which process financial,
accounting and billing information, all electronic data files, including prior drafts, “deleted”

files and file fragments, containing information about or related to:

1. Transfer of any Australian Product destined for Iraq under any application of the

Australian Wheat Board.

2. Transactions of Australian Uranium while Australia was a part of any alleged

Uranium Cartel.

3. Financial Records of Australian Wheat Board bribes reflected in Australian Tax Office and
Department of Trade as regards all Transactions reflected in the Cole Commission.

4. Databases of Aboriginal Families murdered, separated, removed from all localities within
Australia and its islands on command or policy of your clients.
5. Databases of all applications of non-whites for any application of stay in Australia.

6. Databases of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq as told the world.

7. Database of the presence of any Australian in Iraq during the declaration of war or sanctions
of the United Nations in Iraq.
8. Databases of all Applications of BHP Billiton as stated in the Cole Report.

9. Databases of BHP Billiton, AWB, and Tigris Oil Conspiracy for the control of Iraq and and
wheat by any Australian Citizen present in Iraq during the United Nations Sanctions and declaration
of hostilities with Iraq.
10. All applications by a Charles Myles Stott, an Australian, with your client. All identification
changes including any aliases.
11. Databases of transactions of Perth Mint reflecting the movement of Saddam Soviet

Stamped Gold through Australian Customs into the Mint.

12. Databases of Garth Evans Minister in Australian Trade or others and his opinions on these IRAQ
AWB trades
13. Australian Wheat Board Databases of investigations with the State Trading

Corporation of India.

14. Databases of all non-whites separated from their little children in violations of the

Child Rights of United Nations, cases in Australian Courts.

15. Databases of all SIEV related actions.

16. Databases of Centrelink reflecting any claim of the plaintiff as regards Nara Avalon.

g. All files, including prior drafts, “deleted” files and file fragments, containing information
from electronic calendars and scheduling programs regarding or related to:

1. Transfer of any Australian Product destined for Iraq under any application of the

Australian Wheat Board.

2. Transactions of Australian Uranium while Australia was a part of any alleged

Uranium Cartel.

3. Financial Records of Australian Wheat Board bribes reflected in Australian Tax Office and
Department of Trade as regards all Transactions reflected in the Cole Commission.
4. Databases of Aboriginal Families murdered, separated, removed from all localities within
Australia and its islands on command or policy of your clients.
5. Databases of all applications of non-whites for any application of stay in Australia.

6. Databases of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq as told the world.

7. Database of the presence of any Australian in Iraq during the declaration of war or sanctions
of the United Nations in Iraq.
8. Databases of all Applications of BHP Billiton as stated in the Cole Report.

9. Databases of BHP Billiton, AWB, and Tigris Oil Conspiracy for the control of Iraq and and
wheat by any Australian Citizen present in Iraq during the United Nations Sanctions and declaration
of hostilities with Iraq.
10. All applications by a Charles Myles Stott, an Australian, with your client. All identification
changes including any aliases.
11. Databases of transactions of Perth Mint reflecting the movement of Saddam Soviet

Stamped Gold through Australian Customs into the Mint.

12. Databases of Garth Evans Minister in Australian Trade or others and his opinions on these IRAQ
AWB trades
13. Australian Wheat Board Databases of investigations with the State Trading

Corporation of India.

14. Databases of all non-whites separated from their little children in violations of the

Child Rights of United Nations, cases in Australian Courts.

15. Databases of all SIEV related actions.

16. Databases of Centrelink reflecting any claim of the plaintiff as regards Nara Avalon.

h. All electronic data files, including prior drafts, “deleted” files and file fragments about or
related to:

1. Transfer of any Australian Product destined for Iraq under any application of the

Australian Wheat Board.

2. Transactions of Australian Uranium while Australia was a part of any alleged

Uranium Cartel.

3. Financial Records of Australian Wheat Board bribes reflected in Australian Tax Office and
Department of Trade as regards all Transactions reflected in the Cole Commission.
4. Databases of Aboriginal Families murdered, separated, removed from all localities within
Australia and its islands on command or policy of your clients.
5. Databases of all applications of non-whites for any application of stay in Australia.

6. Databases of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq as told the world.

7. Database of the presence of any Australian in Iraq during the declaration of war or sanctions
of the United Nations in Iraq.
8. Databases of all Applications of BHP Billiton as stated in the Cole Report.

9. Databases of BHP Billiton, AWB, and Tigris Oil Conspiracy for the control of Iraq and and
wheat by any Australian Citizen present in Iraq during the United Nations Sanctions and declaration
of hostilities with Iraq.
10. All applications by a Charles Myles Stott, an Australian, with your client. All identification
changes including any aliases.
11. Databases of transactions of Perth Mint reflecting the movement of Saddam Soviet

Stamped Gold through Australian Customs into the Mint.

12. Databases of Garth Evans Minister in Australian Trade or others and his opinions on these IRAQ
AWB trades
13. Australian Wheat Board Databases of investigations with the State Trading

Corporation of India.

14. Databases of all non-whites separated from their little children in violations of the

Child Rights of United Nations, cases in Australian Courts.

15. Databases of all SIEV related actions.

16. Databases of Centrelink reflecting any claim of the plaintiff as regards Nara Avalon.

2. Online Data Storage on Mainframes and Minicomputers: With regard to online storage and/or direct
access storage devices attached to your client’s {clients’} mainframe computers and/or
minicomputers: they are not to modify or delete any electronic data files, “deleted” files and file
fragments existing at the time of this letter’s delivery, which meet the definitions set forth in
this letter, unless a true and correct copy of each such electronic data file has been made and
steps have been taken to assure that such a copy will be preserved and accessible for purposes of
this litigation.

3. Offline Data Storage, Backups and Archives, Floppy Diskettes, Tapes and Other Removable
Electronic Media: With regard to all electronic media used for offline storage, including magnetic
tapes and cartridges and other media that, at the time of this letter’s delivery, contained any
electronic data meeting the criteria listed in paragraph 1 above: Your client {clients} is {are} to
stop any activity that may result in the loss of such electronic data, including rotation,
destruction, overwriting and/or erasure of such media in whole or in part. This request is intended
to cover all removable electronic media used for data storage in connection with their computer
systems, including magnetic tapes and cartridges, magneto-optical disks, floppy diskettes and all
other media, whether used with personal computers, minicomputers or mainframes or other computers,
and whether containing backup and/or archive data sets and other electronic data, for all of their
computer systems.

4. Replacement of Data Storage Devices: Your client {clients} is {are} not to dispose of any
electronic data storage devices and/or media that may be replaced due to failure and/or upgrade
and/or other reasons that may contain electronic data meeting the criteria listed in paragraph 1
above.

5. Fixed Drives on Stand-Alone Personal Computers and Network Workstations: With regard to
electronic data meeting the criteria listed in paragraph 1 above, which existed on fixed drives
attached to stand-alone microcomputers and/or network workstations at the time of this letter’s
delivery: Your client {clients} is {are} not to alter or erase such electronic data, and not to
perform other procedures (such as data compression and disk de-fragmentation or optimization
routines) that may impact such data, unless a true and correct copy has been made of such
active files and of completely restored versions of such deleted electronic files and file
fragments, copies have been made of all directory listings (including hidden files) for all
directories and subdirectories containing such files, and arrangements have been made to preserve
copies during the pendency of this litigation.

6. Programs and Utilities: Your client {clients} is {are} to preserve copies of all application
programs and utilities, which may be used to process electronic data covered by this letter.

7. Log of System Modifications: Your client {clients} is {are} to maintain an activity log to
document modifications made to any electronic data processing system that may affect the system’s
capability to process any electronic data meeting the criteria listed in paragraph 1 above,
regardless of whether such modifications were made by employees, contractors, vendors and/or any
other third parties.

8. Personal Computers Used by Your Employees and/or Their Secretaries and Assistants: The following
steps should immediately be taken in regard to all personal computers used by your client’s
{clients’} employees and/or their secretaries and assistants.

a. As to fixed drives attached to such computers: (i) a true and correct copy is to be made of
all electronic data on such fixed drives relating to this matter, including all active files and
completely restored versions of all deleted electronic files and file fragments; (ii) full
directory listings (including hidden files) for all directories and subdirectories (including
hidden directories) on such fixed drives should be written; and (iii) such copies and
listings are to be preserved until this matter reaches its final resolution.

b. All floppy diskettes, magnetic tapes and cartridges, and other media used in connection with
such computers prior to the date of delivery of this letter containing any electronic

data relating to this matter are to be collected and put into storage for the duration of this
lawsuit.

9. Evidence Created Subsequent to This Letter: With regard to electronic data created subsequent to
the date of delivery of this letter, relevant evidence is not be destroyed and your client
{clients} is {are} to take whatever steps are appropriate to avoid destruction of evidence.

In order to assure that your and your client’s {clients’} obligation to preserve documents and
things will be met, please forward a copy of this letter to all persons and entities with custodial
responsibility for the items referred to in this letter.

Sincerely,

Jugvir Inder Singh

PRO SE

CERTIFICATION

A True and correct copy of the letter of spoliation, being a part of Discovery, was emailed to the
UNITED NATIONS , UN Headquarters, Mr. Nicolas Michel, Under Secretary-General, The Legal Counsel,,
ROOM 3427A, First Avenue at 46th Street, New York, NY 10017 , Tel (212) 963-1234 TEL (212)963-5012
and M.P. Dillon, Office of
the Prosecutor, Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands, Boîte postale 19519,
2500 CM La Haye, Pays Bas, Telephone / Téléphone: + 31 70 5158515 • Facsimile / Télécopie: + 31 70
5158555 • http://www.icc-cpi.int

signed:

Jugvir I Singh

Pro Se.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Court File No.: 07-1170

JUGVIR INDER SINGH AND ANTHR.

Plaintiff,

v. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS, Defendants

TO:

UNITED NATIONS │ UN Headquarters
│ Mr. Nicolas Michel, │ Under-Secretary-General,
│ The Legal Counsel, │ ROOM 3427A
│ First Avenue at 46th Street
│ New York, NY 10017 │ Tel (212) 963-1234
│ TEL (212)963-5012

TO:

M.P. Dillon,
Office of the Prosecutor,
Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague,
The Netherlands, Boîte postale 19519, 2500 CM La Haye, Pays Bas, Telephone / Téléphone: + 31 70
5158515 • Facsimile / Télécopie: + 31 70 5158555 • http://www.icc- cpi.int

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS

Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") Plaintiffs, request
Defendants to produce the documents specified below, within thirty (30) days of service, to [Jugvir
Inder Singh], or at such other time and place, or in such other manner, as may be mutually agreed
upon by the parties. Defendants’ production of documents shall be in accordance with the
Instructions and Definitions set forth below and Fed.R.Civ.P. 34.

INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS

(a) Whenever reference is made to a person, it includes any and all of such person's principals,
employees, agents, attorneys, consultants and other representatives.

(b) When production of any document in Plaintiffs' possession is requested, such request includes
documents subject to the Plaintiffs' possession, custody or control. In the event that Defendant is
able to provide only part of the document(s) called for in any particular Request for Production,
provide all document(s) that Defendants are able to provide and state the reason, if any, for the
inability to provide the remainder.

(c) "Document(s)" means all materials within the full scope of Fed.R.Civ.P. 34 including but not
limited to: all writings and recordings, including the originals and all non- identical copies,
whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copies or otherwise
(including but without limitation to, email and attachments, correspondence, memoranda, notes,
diaries, minutes, statistics, letters, telegrams, minutes, contracts, reports, studies, checks,
statements, tags, labels, invoices, brochures, periodicals, telegrams, receipts, returns,
summaries, pamphlets, books, interoffice and intraoffice communications, offers, notations of
any sort of conversations, working papers, applications, permits, file wrappers, indices,
telephone calls, meetings or printouts, teletypes, telefax, invoices, worksheets, and all
drafts,alterations,modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), graphic or aural
representations of any kind (including without limitation, photographs, charts, microfiche,
microfilm, videotape, recordings, motion pictures, plans, drawings, surveys), and
electronic, mechanical,

magnetic, optical or electric records or representations of any kind (including without limitation,
computer files and programs, tapes, cassettes, discs, recordings), including metadata.
(d) If any document is withheld from production under a claim of privilege or other exemption from
discovery, state the title and nature of the document, and furnish a list signed by the attorney of
record giving the following information with respect to each document withheld:
(i) the name and title of the author and/or sender and the name and title of the recipient; (ii)
the date of the document's origination;
(iii) the name of each person or persons (other than stenographic or clerical assistants)

participating in the preparation of the document);
(iv) the name and position, if any, of each person to whom the contents of the documents have been
communicated by copy, exhibition, reading or substantial summarization;
(v) a statement of the specific basis on which privilege is claimed and whether or not the subject
matter or the contents of the document is limited to legal advice or information provided for the
purpose of securing legal advice; and
(vi) the identity and position, if any, of the person or persons supplying the attorney signing the
list with the information requested in subparagraphs above.
(e) "Relate(s) to," "related to" or "relating to" means to refer to, reflect, concern, pertain to
or in any manner be connected with the matter discussed.
(f) Every Request for Production herein shall be deemed a continuing Request for Production, and
Defendant is to supplement its answers promptly if and when Defendant obtains responsive documents
which add to or are in any way inconsistent with Defendant's initial production.
(g) These discovery requests are not intended to be duplicative. All requests should be responded
to fully and to the extent not covered by other requests. If there are documents that are
responsive to more than one request, please note and produce each such document first in
response to the request that is more specifically directed to the subject matter of the particular
document.

(h) Any word written in the singular herein shall be construed as plural or vice versa when
necessary to facilitate the response to any request.
(i) "And" as well as "or" shall be construed disjunctively or conjunctively as necessary in order
to bring within the scope of the request all responses which otherwise might be construed to be
outside its scope.

DOCUMENT REQUESTS

1. All documents with reference to or written policies, procedures and guidelines related to
Defendant's computers, computer systems, electronic data and electronic media including, but not
limited to, the following:

a. Backup tape rotation schedules;

b. Electronic data retention, preservation and destruction schedules;

c. Employee use policies of company computers, data, and other technology;

d. File naming conventions and standards;

e. Password, encryption and other security protocols;

f. Diskette, CD, DVD, and other removable media labeling standards;

g. Email storage conventions (i.e., limitations on mailbox sizes/storage locations,
schedule and logs for storage, etc.);

h. Electronic media deployment, allocation and maintenance procedures for new employees,
current employees or departed employees;

i. Software and hardware upgrades (including patches) for [2005 TO PRESENT] (who and what
organization conducted such upgrades); and

j. Personal or home computer usage for work-related activities.

2. Organization charts for all Information Technology or Information Services
departments or divisions from [2005 TO PRESENT].

3. Backup tapes containing email and other electronic data related to this action from

[2005 TO PRESENT].

4. Exact copies (i.e., bit-by-bit mirror image copies) of all hard drives on the desktop computers,
laptop computers, notebook computers, personal digital assistant computers, servers, and other
electronic media related to this action
from [2005 TO PRESENT].

5. Exact copies of all relevant disks, CDs, DVDs and other removable media related to this action
from [2005 TO PRESENT].

6. For each interrogatory set forth in Plaintiffs' First Interrogatories, produce all
documents which Defendant referred to, relied upon, consulted or used in any way in answering such
interrogatory.

7. All documents that contain or otherwise relate to the facts or information that Defendants
contend refute, in any way, the allegations contained in the Complaint in this action.

8. All reports, including drafts, submitted by any expert witness or potential expert witness
retained or consulted by any Defendant with respect to the issues raised in this case.
9. All information flow as included in on any device described in the spoliation letter request
already filed with you.
10. Using the spoliation letter as a template if data is produced then include the legacy where
drawn from. In all of these cases, confirm the collected facts, and the sources that represent
them, using another person or system that can be used to support or refute the facts. Example
Australian Wheat Board saying it exported Wheat To Iraq is refuted by the false documents stating
the Wheat were eggs or something in the Cole Commission Report.
11. Using the spoliation letter and the complaint as a template, produce the documents of all
sources that are investigating and or debating these issues, facts or matters.
12. If there is a transaction produced support that transaction with a tax report and supporting
documents, transactions at a time and produce the transactions.
13. As part of the process of producing the data, Use Case Diagrams, Dynamic Models, Process Maps,
Data Flow Diagrams, Sequence Diagrams.
14 Using the complaint and spoliation letter as a template produce the goals you’re your client
process scenarios achieved against the object role model with example data to test a particular
chain of facts involved in the process scenario, So that I can must be able to process the entire
scenario without any perceivable gaps, such as a missing fact to support a process or after all
process scenarios have been consider, leftover facts that

were not used by any of the process scenarios. If there are some gaps then either the process
scenario needs to be adjusted and/or the data model they can closed in subsequent requests.
15. Produce all false documents produced by your clients, using the complaint and spoliation letter
as templates and produce the methods and means of how the process and supporting documents were
falsified.

Produce all documents concerning any issue involving children in your client membership
of Australia that is present in any office of the United Nations or the International Criminal
Court .
If Child Rights have been violated by your member state of Australia then produce all documents of
every issue on every violation and your response to keeping the member state within your membership
From the time of your creation to present produce a timeline and details of the Australian
Aparthied White Only Policy and your continued membership in opposition to these policies.
Produce all the investigations of the child transportation of the Aborigine Families from

Australia around the world, while being a member of your group.

If Australia supplied Uranium for the explosion of any nuclear device in the world then provide
data of that delivery.
If Australia delivered any goods to IRAQ while USA was in hostilities with IRAQ then produce the
movement and satellite photographs of every truck carting wheat with Iraq during the hostilities.
Which of the Trucks carrying wheat in IRAQ were described as Trucks carrying Weapons
of Mass destruction, claimed by General Colin Powell before your body produce details of
the evidence.
BHP Billiton moved Saddam Hussien Gold from Iraq to Jordan then from Jordan by plane to Great
Britain, from there onward to Hong Kong, then from there to Perth to pay for IRON filings and
Tigris Oil deals with Australian Wheat Board, produce all documents on this finding, true
or false.

During hostilities with Iraq, Alia Transport of Jordan and Suddam Hussien Partnership use American
Express and BNP Paribas and other Banks in United States, produce the documents that support or
disclaim this allegation.
16. The Anglo American group with your membership has a worldwide spy network, called Echelon,
comprising UK, USA, Australia, New Zealand with uplink and downlink data around the world. Account
for all the world human rights violations within your memberships secret spying on world citizens
and produce the documents of complaints against the Echelon Spying Network.
17. The Niger Nuclear papers allowing your members to attack another member were fraudulent and
passed fraudulently between your membership to defraud the world, produce the paper trail of the
Valery Plame and Edward Wilson Niger Uranium paper trail and timeline details.
18. Not ONE weapon of Mass destruction has been located produce the day to day IRAQ satellite
monitoring that accounts for the movement of weapons and every truck or vehicle departing Iraq as
claimed by your membership Reconnaissance of IRAQ.

Date: Monday, October 13, 2008

[Jugvir Inder Singh]

[PRO SE]

[4409, Hoffner, Suite 405, Orlando, Fl. 32812] [5714268522]
CERTIFICATION
A true copy of Request Production was sent by email to A True and correct copy of the letter of
spoliation, being a part of Discovery, was emailed to the UNITED NATION, UN Headquarters, Mr.
Nicolas Michel, Under Secretary-General, The Legal Counsel,, ROOM 3427A, First Avenue at 46th
Street, New York, NY 10017 , Tel (212) 963-1234
TEL (212)963-5012 and M.P. Dillon, Office of the Prosecutor, Post Office Box 19519,
2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands, Boîte postale 19519, 2500 CM La Haye, Pays Bas, Telephone /
Téléphone: + 31 70 5158515 • Facsimile / Télécopie: + 31 70 5158555 • http://www.icc-cpi.int
Monday, October 13, 2008
[Jugvir Inder Singh]

[PRO SE]
[4409, Hoffner, Suite 405, Orlando, Fl. 32812]
[5714268522]

]]>